This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2018)
English property law is the law of acquisition, sharing and protection of valuable assets in England and Wales. While part of the United Kingdom, many elements of Scots property law are different. In England, property law encompasses four main topics:
- English land law, or the law of "real property"
- English trusts law
- English personal property law
- United Kingdom intellectual property law
Property in land is the domain of the law of real property. The law of personal property is particularly important for commercial law and insolvency. Trusts affect everything in English property law. Intellectual property is also an important branch of the law of property. For unregistered land see Unregistered land in English law.
- Statute of Quia Emptores 1290
- R v Earl of Northumberland (1568), known as the Case of mines
- Law of Property Act 1925, Land Registration Act 1925 (see also, Land Registration Act 1862)
- Land Registration Act 2002 and HM Land Registry
- Land tenure in England
- Fee simple (freehold)
- Concurrent estate and Four unities
- Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115
- Tulk v Moxhay (1848) 41 ER 1143
- Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000
- The Port of London Authority v Ashmore  EWCA Civ 30, regarding adverse possession of a river bed.
The division of property into real and personal represents in a great measure the division into immovable and movable incidentally recognized in Roman law and generally adopted since. "Things personal," according to Blackstone, "are goods, money, and all other movables which may attend the owner's person wherever he thinks proper to go". This identification of things personal with movables, though logical in theory, does not, as will be seen, perfectly express the English law, owing to the somewhat anomalous position of chattels real. In England real property is supposed to be superior in dignity to personal property, which was originally of little importance from a legal point of view. This view is the result of feudal ideas, and had no place in the Roman system, in which immovables and movables were dealt with as far as possible in the same manner, and descended according to the same rules. The main differences between real and personal property which still exist in England are:
- In real property there can be nothing more than limited ownership; there can be no estate properly so called in personal property, and it may be held in complete ownership. There is nothing corresponding to an estate-tail in personal property; words which in real property would create an estate-tail will give an absolute interest in personalty. A life-interest may, however, be given in personalty, except in articles quae ipso usu consumuntur. Limitations of personal property, equally with those of real property, fall within the rule against perpetuities.
- Personal property is not subject to various incidents of real property, such as rent, dower or escheat.
- On the death of the owner intestate real property descends to the heir; personal property is divided according to the Statute of Distributions.
- Real property as a general rule must be transferred by deed; personal property does not need so solemn a mode of transfer.
- Contracts relating to real property must be in writing by the Statute of Frauds; contracts relating to personal property need only be in writing when it is expressly so provided by statute, as, for instance, in the cases falling under s. 17 of the Statute.
- A will of lands need not be proved, but a will of personalty or of personal and real property together must be proved in order to give a title to those claiming under it.
- Devises of real estate fall as a rule within the Mortmain Acts (see Charity And Charities; Corporation); bequests of personal property, other than chattels real, are not within the act.
- Mortgages of real property need not generally be registered; mortgages of personal property for the most part require registration under the Bills of Sale Act 1878 (see Pledge, and Bill Of Sale).
Personal estate is divided in English law into chattels real and chattels personal; the latter are again divided into choses in possession and choses in action (see Chattel; Chose).
Interest in personal property may be either absolute or qualified. The latter case is illustrated by animals ferae naturae, in which property is only coextensive with detention. Personal property may be acquired by occupancy (including the accessio, commixtio, and confusio of Roman law), by invention, as patent and copyright, or by transfer, either by the act of the law (as in bankruptcy, judgment and intestacy), or by the act of the party (as in gift, contract and will).
There are several cases in which, by statute or otherwise, property is taken out of the class of real or personal to which it seems naturally to belong. By the operation of the equitable doctrine of conversion money directed to be employed in the purchase of land, or land directed to be turned into money, is in general regarded as that species of property into which it is directed to be converted. An example of property prima facie real which is treated as personal is an estate pur autre vie, which, since 1740, is distributable as personal property in the absence of a special occupant. Examples of property prima facie personal which is treated as real are fixtures, heirlooms, such as deeds and family portraits, and shares in some of the older companies, as the New River Company, which are real estate by statute. In ordinary cases shares in companies are personal property, unless the shareholders have individually some interest in the land as land.
The terms heritable and movable of Scots law to a great extent correspond with the real and personal of English law. The main points of difference are:
- Leases are heritable as to the succession to the lessee, unless the destination expressly exclude heirs, but are movable as to the fisk.
- Money due on mortgages and securities on land is personalty in England. At common law in Scotland debts secured on heritable property are themselves heritable. But by the Titles to Land Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1868, heritable securities are movable as far as regards the succession of the creditor, unless executors are expressly excluded. They still, however, remain heritable quoad fiscum, as between husband and wife, in computing legitim, and as far as regards the succession of the debtor.
- Up to 1868 the heir of heritage succeeded to certain movable goods called heirship movables, which bore a strong likeness to the heirlooms of English law. This right of the heir was abolished by the Act of 1868.
- Annuities, as having tractum futuri temporis, are heritable, and an obligation to pay them falls upon the heir of the deceased.
The law in the United States agrees in most respects with that of England. Heirlooms are unknown, one reason being, no doubt, that the importance of title-deeds is much less than it is in England, owing to the operation of the Registration Acts. Long terms in some states have annexed to them the properties of freehold estates. In some states estates pur autre vie descend like real property; in others an estate pur autre vie is deemed a freehold only during the life of the grantee; after his death it becomes a chattel real. In yet other states the heir has a scintilla of interest as special occupant. In some states railway rolling stock is considered as purely personal, in others it has been held to be a fixture, and so to partake of the nature of real property. Shares in some of the early American corporations were, like New River shares in England, made real estate by statute, as in the case of the Cape Sable Company in Maryland. In Louisiana animals employed in husbandry are, and slaves were, regarded as immovables. Pews in churches are generally real property, but in some states they are made personal property by statute. The assignment of choses in action is generally permitted, and is in most states regulated by statute. U. W.)
- Carrier's Case (1473) 13 Edw. IV, f. 9, pl. 5 (Star Ch. and Exch. Ch.) - on the crime of larcency.
- Armory v Delamirie (1722) K.B., 1 Strange 505, 93 ER 664
- Waverley Borough Council v Fletcher  4 All ER 756, council had the better right to a brooch found on its land
- Parker v British Airways Board  1 QB 1004, the finder of a bracelet in Heathrow airport could keep it and the Board did not own it
- Dearle v Hall (1828) 3 Russ 1
- R v Knowles, ex parte Somersett (Somersett's Case) (1772) 20 State Tr 1; (1772) Lofft 1 - concerning the illegality of property in people (i.e. slavery) in England.
- Thomas v Times Book Company  1 WLR 911, requirement to make a gift is a true intention, so a person told he could keep the manuscript of a play "if he could find it" was a gift
The law relating to trusts of land was adjusted by the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) which came into force in 1997. This had a significant impact, particularly in relation to bankruptcy and the associated importance of the family home - see "Re Shaire" 2001. There have also been discussions in relation to trusts of land and the Human Rights Act 1998.
- Stack v Dowden
- Strong v Bird  LR 18 Eq 315, the testators of a stepmother who did not seek to recover a debt could not recover the money, because her released was voluntary. An exception to the rule that equity will not assist a volunteer.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008)
- ^ Blackstone, William (1775). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 16.
- ^ 29 Car. II. (1677), c. 3, s. 4
- ^ Common Recoveries, etc. Act 1740, 14 Geo. 2, c. 20, s.9, now replaced by the Wills Act 1837, s.6
- ^ 31-32 Vict, c. 101, s. 117
- ^ at s. 160
- ^ Watson, Law Diet. s.v. " Annuities"
- ^ Kent, Comm. iv. 27
- ^ Schouler, Law of Personal Property, i.
- C Harpum, S Bridge, and M Dixon, Megarry and Wade: The Law of Real Property (Sweet and Maxwell 2008)
- S Worthington, Personal Property Law: Text and Materials (Hart 2000)
- Cohen, Morris R. (1927). "Property and Sovereignty". Cornell Law Quarterly. Cornell Law School. 13 (1): 8–30.