Talk:Red carpet

WikiProject Culture (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignmentEdit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: H0187160.

Above undated message substituted from assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blood line of royal familiesEdit

The red carpet symbolizes the blood line of royal families. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:28, May 16, 2007 (UTC)

This corroborates an allusion made by Michael Tsarion in 2012 - The Future of Mankind[dead link] at Google Videos. Some source should be provided for this before it can be mentioned in the article, though. __meco 11:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A likely explanation, but isn't blue blood normally associated with royalty? regards Lynbarn (talk) 09:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was also my understanding that it represented elite bloodline. Like the term, red tape. Although there may not be any evidence for this for the time being that Wikipedia may accept. Neurolanis (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Traceable to Agamemnon?Edit

The allusion to Agamemnon is fascinating, but surely in that play the "crimson path" is a hidden reference to the fact that the king is about to be welcomed in to a bloodbath at the hands of his wife - not exactly a good precedent for diplomatic hospitality! I suspect that the tradition has more recent origins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]